Chris A. Brandlehner BLOG - Category : Bug Chris A. Brandlehner BLOG - Category : Bug Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:00:37 +0200 http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf Directory Links not supported in some situationshttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6SFC88BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6SFC88http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6SFC88unsupported in some configurations.
In my case I worked with a customer who wanted to use roaming for a large number of users. He agreed to use the standard roaming directory which defaults to roaming. For performance reasons we decided to place the roaming data on a separate disk so we linked roaming to a directory on the other disk.
We soon found that we could no longer upgrade users to roaming users because the Admin Client failed with the error File does not exist on remote server.

A PMR was opened and the analyst soon found SPR SHEZ6Q9HTK. The bad news is that this SPR is currently on the status unsupported configuration.

I usually understand why some problems could not be fixed or are declared as unsupported configuration, but please can anybody tell me why this is an unsupported configuration (and I do not accept because it has not been tested, it is unsupported?]]>Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:41:51 +02001http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=50AFB4B489CAAFACC12571C3002F3D4Dhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=50AFB4B489CAAFACC12571C3002F3D4DLotus Notes 7 crashes with error Microsoft Visual C++http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-6KZJFBBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-6KZJFBhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-6KZJFB This problem is due to the fact that one file is being installed into the wrong directory. You can move the file dt_socket.dll from NOTESPROGDIR\jvm\bin to NOTESPROGDIR. That fixed the problem for me where the Notes Client was crashing in a view where an image resource for a view action was missing.
]]>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:04:41 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=D61F8F05DE3AA678C12570F5004D553Ahttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=D61F8F05DE3AA678C12570F5004D553AMenubar and Toolbar disapearing in Windows Explorerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6KGP2QBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6KGP2Qhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6KGP2QWinTotal I managed to repair my Explorer. The trick was to delete the key ITBarLayout from the registry-key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Toolbar\Explorer.]]>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:56:19 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=378B70CDE98B62B0C12570E40062CC92http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=378B70CDE98B62B0C12570E40062CC92Comma in filename or directory name not working with Lotus Noteshttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6KBJVUBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6KBJVUhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6KBJVUThu, 22 Dec 2005 15:23:42 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=BB2DAAB0898F9766C12570DF004F1325http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=BB2DAAB0898F9766C12570DF004F1325If you are running Notes 6.5.4http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-6D5MM5BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-6D5MM5http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-6D5MM5 notes://runNSD/now

]]>Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +02004http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=E8E429F5658743D2C1257019005BDC61http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=E8E429F5658743D2C1257019005BDC61Lotus Securityhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6B9TYCBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6B9TYChttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-6B9TYCSat, 9 Apr 2005 00:08:30 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=7BD5F9C85157134EC1256FDD0079A0F6http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=7BD5F9C85157134EC1256FDD0079A0F6Uploading more than one file at the same timehttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-66RLJ6BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-66RLJ6http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-66RLJ6I was working on an option to upload photos to the ONPD database. While doing some tests I ran into a problem with uploading more than one file at once using the file upload control. This works just for the first file, the others will fail.

All Domino Servers running on UNIX operating systems (Linux, AIX, ...) are affected. This is a bug which is fixed in 6.5.4, SPR THTO63TR3Y.

]]>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:47:26 +02003http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=7B3A361EFAA1F0E5C1256F4D0056BD7Dhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=7B3A361EFAA1F0E5C1256F4D0056BD7DSMTPMaxforRecipients does not workhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-66LEE6BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-66LEE6http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-66LEE6Just for the records. The IBM Redbook "Lotus Domino 6 spam survival Guide" does recommend to use SMTPMaxforRecipients in the notes.ini to reduce the effectiveness of harvesting email addresses. Chapter 4.5.2 in: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246930.pdf

This parameter does not seem to work, neither in 5.x nor in 6.x. The problem is known as SPR TMEN62PF8B if you like to request a fix.

]]>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:33:49 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=89635E711BE06809C1256F48003A075Dhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=89635E711BE06809C1256F48003A075DProblem in Domino 6.5.2 inbound SMTP codehttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-63KTBGBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-63KTBGhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-63KTBG
Error appending message originator item to note; Field is too large (32K) or View's column & selection formulas are too large
554 Error writing message to safe storage; unable to append local content to message
SMTP Server: Error appending additional fields to received message
]]>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:35:04 +02003http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=D537C7FDA4F26829C1256EE700768718http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=D537C7FDA4F26829C1256EE700768718Database properties set through LotusScript in R5 are lost when the property box is opened and closed in R6.http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-62DHG7BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-62DHG7http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-62DHG7Database properties which have been set through LotusScript executed on an R5 client are lost if the database property box is opened and closed on an R6 client. This applies to cases where the database resides on an R5 server. ]]>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:10:36 +02001http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=5228DEEBA8D6A613C1256EC100487561http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=5228DEEBA8D6A613C1256EC100487561Is this a compiler bug in Lotus Notes 6?http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5ZEMV4BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5ZEMV4http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5ZEMV4I came along a very strange problem with the Lotus Notes 6 compiler today. Just to save time I tried to use 1024 * 1024 instead of 1048576. The Lotus Notes Designer Client refused to save this with error "overflow". When using a variable containing 1024 instead of using the number itself there seems to be no problem. Weird!

Sub Click(Source As Button)
        Dim number As Double
        Dim a As Double
        a = 1024
' just to proof that Long is big enough
        number = 1048576
'next line will work fine
        number = a * 1024
' this would not work, why??
' number = 1024 * 1024        
        Print number
End Sub

]]>Fri, 28 May 2004 18:56:08 +02002http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=4B0F51C8CD13C70FC1256EA2005D1807http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=4B0F51C8CD13C70FC1256EA2005D1807Domino 6.5.x Router Performance, Hang or Crashes Delivering Messages to Mail File Using Block Sender Rulehttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5XDLJMBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5XDLJMhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5XDLJMIBM introduced Mail Rules in Lotus Notes 5.x. While this feature was working quite well an enhancement of these rules in ND6 causes some troubles. IBM asks his customers running Notes 6.5.0 and 6.5.1 to update the mailtemplates. See this Technote for details. ]]>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:48:06 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=F9A61F7355557BC8C1256E610056A7D4http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=F9A61F7355557BC8C1256E610056A7D4Notes Document Shortcuts crashing Windows Explorerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-5TUT8JBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-5TUT8Jhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/DOMO-5TUT8JAnother Bug that has everything it needs to come onto my personal favorites list. Read on and decide by your own:

In Lotus Notes 6 you can "Drag and Drop" a document from any view or folder onto your Windows Desktop or any folder on your harddisk. Notes automatically creates a Document Shortcut which is in fact a file with the extionsion .shb which are marked by registry entries as special objects like files with extionsion .lnk.

Try to create such a Document Shortcut and cut it from your Desktop to paste it into any folder - this will crash your Windows Explorer.

If you experience the same problem please report it to IBM Lotus Support, they are looking for reproduceable scenarios to get this fixed in a later release.

]]]>Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:30:29 +02008http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=29444007A34CD317C1256DF000762461http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=29444007A34CD317C1256DF000762461Remove a group from all your databases ACL?http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5TE9HVBugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5TE9HVhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5TE9HVTue, 18 Nov 2003 07:23:43 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=DFB74EAE02C8195CC1256DE20023216Dhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=DFB74EAE02C8195CC1256DE20023216DTranslation Problem in Lotus Notes Clienthttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5TBLG8BugChristian Brandlehnerhttp://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5TBLG8http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/d6plinks/CBRR-5TBLG8I heard about a strange Problem in the Lotus Notes Client which should exist in all localized Versions beginning with 6.0 up to version 6.5. As you can see on the screenshot of a repeating calendar entry the weekdays are displayed in english language instead of german.
I heard rumors that customers, who are contacting the software vendor, would get help but I can't go into detail here. ]]>Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:44:19 +02000http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/CommentsRSS?Open&id=687057BA62CF050FC1256DDF00566337http://chris.brandlehner.at/Brandlehner/cab_blog.nsf/PostComment?RunAgent&id=687057BA62CF050FC1256DDF00566337